| I could have lived with the verdict
had I gotten a fair trial, but I believe I did not get a
fair trial.
Mr. Tarpey portrayed me to the jury as a dishonest woman
attempting to get some money by lying about poor Doctor
Kagan. Dr. Kagan -
who was kind enough to do a free surgical procedure on me.
Dr. Kagan - who got a lawsuit filed against him in return
for his kindness,
due to my “disappointed expectations.” According to Mr. Tarpey,
I went to doctor after doctor to carry out my plan to file
a lawsuit against Dr.
Kagan because of my "disappointed expectations." According
to Mr. Tarpey, Mr. Deratany also lied to and manipulated
my
treating physicians, again only to get money from poor Dr.
Kagan because of my "disappointed expectations."
It was a living hell to sit quietly and listen to the defense's
endless lies and misrepresentations
during that trial. My being called a liar over and over
throughout the trial was almost unbearable. I was first
victimized
by Dr. Kagan on an operating table, unconscious and unable
to defend myself, and then over and over again during the
trial.
The malpractice
suit that I filed against Dr. Kagan was not about money.
If the verdict came back in my favor, the amount of money
that
the jury would have awarded me in damages
would not have mattered. I just wanted Dr. Kagan held accountable
for what he did to me.
There was a lot of information that we were not permitted
to present to the jury as such information could cause them
to feel "sorry" for me. There were many pictures
of my breasts after Dr. Kagan’s surgery that the defendant
fought to keep the jury from seeing and won. It would have
been "prejudicial".
I don’t understand how such pictures could be considered
to be prejudicial against Dr. Kagan as the pictures showed
my
breasts after they were operated on and disfigured by Dr.
Kagan? The jury never learned that I did not have and
could
not get medical insurance due to my having breast implants.
As a result of being uninsured, I was forced to spend
over
$50,000.00 on medical care and related expenses from the
time of my surgery by Dr. Kagan through the time of the
trial.
The costs that I paid in taking Dr. Kagan to trial were approximately
$40,000.00 out of my pocket. After losing the trial, Mr. Deratany
had repeatedly billed me for an additional $9,000.00 of expenses
that I believe I do not owe. At a later
date he stated to me and then to my husband “you do
not have to pay the remainder of the expenses.” Mr. Tarpey
told the jury that I filed a lawsuit
against Dr. Kagan because of "disappointed expectations."
I cannot imagine that anybody would spend so much money and
put themselves through the horrendous stress of a trial due
to "disappointed expectations." I can imagine someone putting
themselves through that kind of stress and expense looking
for justice, because that is exactly what I did. Perhaps the
jury would have found Mr. Tarpey’s statement as to why I sued
Dr. Kagan as absurd as it really was if they had known all
the information. Mr. Tarpey did a great job in making sure
that didn't happen. I saw first-hand why Mr. Tarpey advertises
himself as specializing in defending medical negligence cases
and why Dr. Kagan hires Mr. Tarpey's firm each time he gets
sued for malpractice.
I continue to live every day of my life, as Dr. Stanton-Hicks
testified that I likely would, with pain in my breasts. It
is very hard to accept that I have to live with this pain
due to a surgery that I did not want and did not consent to.
The last option offered to me that possibly would give me
some pain relief is to have a spinal
cord stimulator surgically implanted in my body. Since
there are risks involving that option that I am not willing
to take, including paralysis,
I am currently just trying to live with the pain.
I have valid issues to appeal the verdict and initially filed
a notice of appeal. I then learned that the appeal would cost
a minimum of $25,000.00 and to retry the case, should we win
the appeal, would cost at least another $25,000.00. I cannot
afford this financially or emotionally. I made the decision
to drop the appeal and to walk away. Welcome to our justice
system!
Commentary Regarding Elective Surgery
I would urge anyone thinking of surgery when the surgery
is not absolutely medically necessary to reconsider. Even
in doing all the research available to you on your prospective
physician you likely will not have complete information on
the doctor. That fact is a frightening reality, as you will
literally be putting your life in his/her hands.
Commentary Regarding Filing a Lawsuit
Should you become injured by a doctor's negligence, choose
your attorney wisely. After the loss of my medical malpractice
case, I would advise a plaintiff not to hire an attorney
from a small firm. They don't have the time or staff to completely
focus on and prepare your case. In an article titled, "Small
Firm Attorneys Face the Most Disciplinary Actions," Robert
Wiener writes, "Unfortunately, the bulk of the complaints
is against small solo practitioners." Ellen Pansky,
a partner in a California firm, said, "Small firms do
not have enough support staff to keep track of all the phone
calls and letters they receive. If a lawyer is involved in
another trial, goes on vacation, or gets sick, there may
be no one there to take care of the client's problems." As
with a prospective doctor, check out your prospective attorney
through your state's governing agency regulating attorneys
. In Illinois that governing agency is the Illinois
Registration & Disciplinary
Commission. Do not expect much from them. The Illinois Registration & Disciplinary
Commision receives approximately 6000 complaints a year and
only investigates 2%. Unfortunately, it is a very similar
scenario as in checking out your doctor. You will only be
told of complaints against the lawyer if the lawyer has been
found guilty of the matter complained of.
As I previously stated, the Illinois Registration & Disciplinary
Commission will likely not investigate an attorney that you
may file a complaint against. Do not let that deter you from
finding justice. Do speak to an attorney that specializes
in legal malpractice. You will certainly find similar difficulties
in bringing a legal malpractice claim just as you do in bringing
medical malpractice claims. It is also very hard to find
an attorney that specializes in legal malpractice. Again,
do not give up in finding justice. Be diligent and you will
find a legal malpractice attorney to listen to your claims
and decide if you do have a valid complaint. I believe that
we should all stand up for ourselves when we have been harmed.
In doing so you may save another person from become victim
to these same people.
Commentary Regarding Being Sued By
My Attorney
As I mentioned above, the attorney who represented me in
my suit against Dr. Kagan, Mr. Deratany, is now suing me for
the publishing of this web site and for legal fees he says
I owe him.
In light of the fact that Mr. Deratany has chosen to sue
me, a friend of mine forwarded an interesting article to me
recently entitled, "Suits
for Legal Fees Seldom Worth Risk of Malpractice"
and he suggested that I place a link to the article from my
site (click the article title to read). As the title suggests,
this brief article offers the advice, "We recommend that
attorneys not sue clients for fees."
|